Current News

June
22

The Conflict Research Society congratulates Noel Anderson on winning the 2026 Conflict Research Society Book of the Year Prize for his book titled Wars Without End: Competitive Intervention, Escalation Control, and Protracted Conflict

At a time when a large majority of civil wars continue to attract some form of external support, Noel Anderson’s Wars Without End makes a major contribution to our understanding of how such involvement shapes conflict dynamics. Anderson’s central argument is that many civil wars become protracted because rival external states simultaneously support opposing sides in what he terms “competitive intervention”. In these situations, interveners face a dual imperative: they want their local clients to prevail, yet they also seek to avoid direct escalation with rival interveners. This produces a pattern of calibrated support that is sufficient to keep local partners fighting but insufficient to deliver decisive victory, producing seemingly endless civil wars. 

The prize committee received over 40 nominations from conflict and peace researchers, institutions, practitioners, and publishers around the world. The winning title was selected from a shortlist of four outstanding books, based on criteria including the significance of its contribution to conflict and peace studies, policy relevance, methodological rigor and credibility of the findings, innovation, interdisciplinarity, and quality of writing.

Anderson particularly impressed the jury by moving beyond the general observation that external support is associated with worse conflict outcomes and identifying a precise mechanism through which it can prolong war. The concept of “competitive intervention” is a novel contribution and offers a theoretically elegant and intuitively compelling explanation for why external involvement so often sustains rather than resolves civil conflict. By shedding light on the strategic calculations of rival sponsors, the book makes an important contribution to research on conflict duration, external support, and proxy warfare.

The book combines statistical analysis with case studies of Angola, Afghanistan, and Syria. These analyses draw on an impressive body of evidence, including original data collection on external support, fieldwork, original interviews, declassified intelligence reports, and archival research. Through this rich empirical foundation, Anderson documents the consequences of competitive intervention for civil wars.

The book’s findings carry important implications for contemporary conflicts and for policymakers considering military assistance as a tool of conflict management. At the same time, the book offers a cautiously optimistic message: while external support remains widespread and has increased on several indicators, competitive intervention has become less prevalent since the end of the Cold War. Anderson argues that this shift has contributed to shorter average conflict durations and a decline in the global prevalence of civil war.

Congratulations to Noel Anderson on a timely and important book that significantly deepens our understanding of the international dynamics that sustain protracted civil wars.

This year’s winner was selected from a shortlist of four exceptional books. 

The judges commended the overall high quality of research in all the shortlisted titles. We extend our congratulations to the following runners-up (in alphabetical order):

Rachel A. Epstein and Oliver Kaplan (eds.). Speaking Science to Power: Responsible Researchers and Policymaking. Oxford University Press. For its thoughtful examination of the opportunities and dilemmas involved in bridging the gap between academic research and policy engagement, providing valuable guidance for researchers and policymakers alike on fostering meaningful engagement while guarding against the misuse of scientific evidence.

Jenny Hedström. Reproducing Revolution: Women’s Labor and the War in Kachinland. Cornell University Press. For its innovative theorization of “militarized social reproduction”, demonstrating how revolutionary warfare depends on often invisible forms of gendered labour. Grounded in several years of in-depth fieldwork with women in Myanmar’s Kachin revolution, and remaining accessible and engaging throughout, the book makes an important contribution to scholarship on gender and armed conflict.

Eric Min. Words of War: Negotiation as a Tool of ConflictCornell University Press. For its original contribution to the study of wartime diplomacy, challenging the conventional view that negotiations are primarily tools for ending conflict and demonstrating, through impressive statistical analyses and historical case studies, how leaders use wartime diplomacy strategically to improve their position and advance their prospects of victory.

Special thanks to the 2026 CRS Book Prize Judges: Zorzeta Bakaki, Isabel A. Phillips, David Randahl, and Corinne Bara (Chair).

Andrea C. Caflisch wins the Cedric Smith Prize 2026

Posted by: Analuciapelaezecheverria Tags: There is no tags | Categories: Current News

April
8

The Conflict Research Society congratulates Andrea C. Caflisch, winner of the Cedric Smith Prize 2026. Andrea is a PhD student at the Department of Political Science and School of Public Policy at University College London. His research focuses on the politics of voluntary and forced migration, on post-conflict recovery and social cohesion, and on the role of formal and informal institutions in resolving disputes and preventing conflict. 

Andrea’s winning paper, “Local Security Provision and Return from Forced Displacement: Evidence from South Sudan,” examines the conditions under which displaced persons return to their home areas, arguing that return decisions are shaped not only by current security conditions but by civilians’ assessments of the responsiveness and military capacity of local security providers. Focusing on ethnic conflicts, it shows how these dynamics are conditioned by the geographical distribution of ethnic groups and control over the state and demonstrates with evidence from South Sudan that community-based militias can facilitate more permanent return under specific conditions.

The jury notes that Andrea’s paper addresses an important and timely research question on the conditions under which displaced persons return to their home areas in conflict-affected settings, and that it advances a novel and compelling theoretical argument emphasizing how civilians assess the capacity and responsiveness of local security providers, particularly community-based militias. The paper combines clear theoretical innovation with a rigorous and ambitious research design, drawing on fine-grained administrative and survey data from South Sudan and introducing an inventive measure of return based on household reunification. In linking civilians’ return decisions to the dual role of local militias as both protectors and potential predators, the study offers a nuanced and sophisticated contribution to debates on security provision in civil war contexts. The jury is especially impressed by the paper’s strong articulation of its broader relevance, its detailed yet transparent theoretical framework, and its careful integration of empirical analysis with contextual knowledge. Overall, the paper is an excellent contribution to peace and conflict research that combines theoretical sophistication with methodological rigor and original empirical insights, and it has significant implications for both academic debates and policy discussions on displacement, return, and local security governance.

The Cedric Smith Prize is awarded annually for the best article or thesis chapter in peace and conflict research by a PhD candidate. This year’s jury consisted of Regine Schwab (Peace Research Institute Frankfurt), Emma Elfversson (Uppsala University), and Promise Ejiofor (University of Cambridge).

The CRS received 20 excellent submissions for the prize from all over the world. Special mention goes to the following four authors who were shortlisted for the prize: Ulas Erdogu, “Leadership Decapitation in Civil War: Leadership Arrest and the Negotiations between the State and the Insurgents”; Eduardo Alvarez Vanegas, “Weapons of the Weakened, but not Wiped Out: Insurgent Adaptability through Life Histories”; Marie-Therese Meye, “Why Some Districts March More: Protest Mobilization in the Wake of U.S. Representatives’ Election Denial”; and Alexandre Raffoul, “Associational Power-Sharing: Managing Ethnic Conflict with Cross-Ethnic Party Systems”.

March
4

The Conflict Research Society is pleased to share the reflections and findings of Xiaodong Bao, recipient of the 2025 Sydney Bailey Fund. Xiaodong is a PhD student at King’s College London. With support from the Sydney Bailey Fund, Xiaodong was able to expand her fieldwork by holding additional interviews and multi-sited ethnographic research. 

Reflecting on her experience, Xiaodong explains:

“As a recipient of the 2025 Sydney Bailey Fund, I’m pleased to share my research with the Conflict Research Society community here. I’m Xiaodong Bao, a PhD student at King’s College London. My research examines China’s engagement in UN peacekeeping operations, with a particular attention to the internal fragmentation and hierarchies within the peacekeeping community itself. Drawing on feminist International Relations and postcolonial peacekeeping studies, I attend to the micro-politics of peacekeepers’ daily lives, to explore how individual Chinese peacekeepers experience and negotiate layered regulations, hierarchical power relations, and contradictory subjectivities. Methodologically, this research is grounded in life-story interviews with former peacekeepers and participant observations of their everyday environments.

Last year, I completed the first phase of my fieldwork in China, spending 6 months conducting approximately 30 life-story interviews with former peacekeepers. This was an invaluable research journey. The stories I encountered gradually unsettled my initial assumptions about peacekeeping. I was really enjoying listening to those messy, mundane, yet deeply revealing accounts from the peacekeeping frontline. I was not only a researcher, but also a listener, a “comrade”, and at times a co-traveler in the emotional landscape of these interviewees’ disillusionment or honourable episodes. 

With support from the Sydney Bailey Fund, I will be able to advance a crucial second phase of fieldwork. Building on the interviews already conducted, the award enables multi-sited ethnographic research. This includes participant observation during a short visit to ongoing UN missions, as well as visits to peacekeeping training centres in China. These in-person engagements will allow me to connect pre-deployment training, everyday mission life, and post-deployment reflections in a single analytical framework. Also, the funding will support a series of follow-up interviews with peacekeepers and relevant officials.

I will continue developing this research through doctoral writing and conference presentations, including sharing findings with the Conflict Research Society community at the Annual Conference in September 2026″.

Call for Programme Chair

Posted by: Analuciapelaezecheverria Tags: There is no tags | Categories: Current News

October
24

The Conflict Research Society (CRS) is inviting applications for the role of Programme Chair for the 2026 CRS Annual Conference.

Eligibility

  • Open to researchers in the peace and conflict field (broadly defined to include political science, sociology, political economy, anthropology, geography, and related disciplines).
  • Minimum eligibility: second-year PhD student or beyond.

Commitment

  • 1 year minimum, with the possibility of continuing up to 3 years.
  • Longer-term engagement may lead to becoming Conference Chair.

Role & Responsibilities

  • Review abstracts and select/reject papers, panels, and workshops.
  • In cooperation with the conference organizing team, take the lead on building the conference programme (including panel composition).
  • Review key email drafts to participants.
  • Attend the CRS Conference and support on-site logistics (the day before and during the event).

What You’ll Gain

  • A chance to shape the programme of one of the leading peace and conflict studies conferences.
  • Experience in academic event organisation and leadership.
  • Opportunities to network with senior and emerging scholars and practitioners.
  • Some financial compensation for your work

How to Apply

Please send a short expression of interest (max 1 page) outlining your background, motivation, and any relevant experience to crsconf@gmail.com by 24 November 2025.

We strongly encourage applications from across disciplines, career stages, and underrepresented groups in the field.

August
20

The Conflict Research Society is pleased to share the reflections and findings of Lucy Kentish, recipient of the 2024 Sydney Bailey Fund. Lucy is a PhD student at the University of Bristol whose research investigates the role of education in addressing division in deeply divided societies, with a focus on Integrated Education and Shared Education in Northern Ireland.

With support from the Sydney Bailey Fund, Lucy was able to expand her fieldwork by holding additional focus groups with young people aged 15–21. These conversations provided valuable insights into how students themselves perceive opportunities for cross-community learning and what they want education to offer in a society navigating peacebuilding.

Reflecting on her experience, Lucy explains:

“My interactions with inspirational teachers who warmly welcomed me into their schools, and conversations with young people from all across Northern Ireland, were exactly what I had hoped for, and more.”

As a Visiting Student at Queen’s University Belfast’s Mitchell Institute, Lucy also benefited from close engagement with academics and peers working on conflict, peace, and education. Immersing herself in everyday life in Northern Ireland allowed her to understand the nuances of a society still grappling with its peace process.

Lucy will present her research at the European Conference on Educational Research (University of Belgrade) and at the Conflict Research Society Annual Conference (University of Kent) in September 2025.

The CRS congratulates Lucy on her achievements and thanks all who contribute to the Sydney Bailey Fund, which continues to support early-career researchers in advancing the study and practice of peace and conflict.

Sharing Research Through Video

Alongside her written reflections, Lucy also created a short video capturing her time in Northern Ireland and the communities she worked with. In the video, she shares her motivations, her fieldwork journey, and her key insights on how young people experience Shared and Integrated Education.

Promise Frank Ejiofor wins the Cedric Smith Prize 2025

Posted by: Analuciapelaezecheverria Tags: There is no tags | Categories: Current News

April
8

The Conflict Research Society congratulates Promise Frank Ejiofor, winner of the Cedric Smith Prize 2025. Promise is a PhD Candidate at the Centre of Development Studies at the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. His research focuses on terrorism and political violence, with a special focus on ethnic politics, gender, race, and decoloniality.

Promise’s winning paper, “Gendercide and Terrorism Studies,” explores the occurrence and rationality of gendercide against civilian men and boys in the Lake Chad region. He argues that the concept of gendercide should be extended beyond the conventional focus on sexual violence, and contextualises gendercide against men and boys as part of the insurgent’s quest to create a caliphate with no resistance from local communities. 

The jury notes that Promise’s paper addresses an important and under-explored research question, and that it makes a compelling case for expanding the concept of gender-based violence in terrorism studies beyond the dominant focus on sexual violence. The paper combines careful theoretical engagement with complex debates on hegemonic masculinity and victimhood, with rich empirical data from 21 in-depth interviews with survivors and ex-Boko Haram combatants in the Lake Chad region. In challenging the dominant perspective on masculinities and gendercide, Promise’s research pushes the field forward both theoretically and philosophically. Overall, the paper is an excellent contribution to peace and conflict research that combines a captivating narrative with theoretical sophistication and original empirical evidence. The paper also has significant implications for both academic and policy debates on civilian protection and gender-based violence.

The Cedric Smith Prize is awarded annually for the best article or thesis chapter in peace and conflict research by a PhD candidate. This year’s jury consisted of Imrana Buba (University of Oslo), Ida Rudolfsen (Peace Research Institute Oslo), and Julia Palmiano Federer (ETH Zürich).

The CRS received 34 excellent submissions for the prize from all over the world. Special mention goes to the following three authors who were shortlisted for the prize: Henrique Garbino, “Rebels against mines? Legitimacy and restraint on landmine use in the Philippines”; Nan Sandi, “Mining policy reform and civil conflict: Evidence from Myanmar; and Ezenwa E. Olumba, “The case for a ‘cognitive turn’ in conflict analysis: Lessons from Afghanistan and the Sahel”.